Worked example
The reported £1.8m acquisition
Reconcile the reported payment schedule and see how rounded earnings change the purchase multiple.
Reported completedThe reported transaction
Sey describes a historical acquisition with roughly £950k adjusted sustainable EBITDA, rounded to £1m in conversation. The disclosed total price is £1.8m: £1m at completion, £400k at month 24 and £400k at month 36. He presents it as an unusually favorable deal enabled by the seller family’s circumstances. The status is reported completed; the source account is not independent verification of the transaction or subsequent performance. Watch source
Reconcile the price
| Payment point | Amount | Cumulative consideration |
|---|---|---|
| Completion | £1,000,000 | £1,000,000 |
| Month 24 | £400,000 | £1,400,000 |
| Month 36 | £400,000 | £1,800,000 |
The full price is therefore £1m + £0.4m + £0.4m = £1.8m. Two valuation calculations explain the rounding:
- £1.8m ÷ £1m rounded earnings = 1.8 times.
- £1.8m ÷ £0.95m adjusted earnings = about 1.89 times.
The second ratio is an editorial calculation using the more precise stated earnings estimate. It is not a different price or a correction to the seller-payment schedule. Completion represents about 55.56% of the total, leaving 44.44% for the two later payments.
Interpret carefully
The schedule preserves early cash relative to paying the entire price immediately, but creates two concentrated later needs. The collection does not provide a full bank facility, tax model, working-capital bridge or evidence of every payment’s eventual discharge. A favorable multiple alone cannot establish the return realized by shareholders.
The most important limit is explicit in the speaker’s description: this was exceptional. It is useful for learning how earnings precision and payment timing affect interpretation, not for promising that buyers routinely obtain profitable businesses on these terms. Read deferred consideration alongside adjusted EBITDA.
Underlying numerical references
Sources & further viewing 1 video
The explanations on this site are independent synthesis. Follow each original for full context. A reported experience is not independent proof of a transaction.
- Personal experience Exceptional £1.8m deal